Saturday, October 4, 2014

You can lead the horse to the water.... Role of curiosity in learning

I saw this report in Scientific American on the role of curiosity in learning.  In a small study, the researchers found how generating curiosity appears to prime the brain for learning.

This provides some evidence for how most educators develop their lesson plans.  One framework is Gagne's 9 events of instruction.  The first step is to "Gain Attention".

Linked to - http://tlweb.latrobe.edu.au/education/learning-materials/lesson-planning/lessonplanning080.html


Maybe we should relabel this to "Generate Curiosity"?

After all one can lead a horse to the water but we can't make it drink; unless we make it thirsty first!

Friday, October 3, 2014

The US Ebola Approach - what we are missing?

This story on NPR highlights the mishandling of the first case of Ebola to be diagnosed in the USA in spite of "training" and information efforts.  Numerous officials have claimed that the course of Ebola in the USA will be very different as it will be easy to contain due to better health care facilities and literacy.  The problem is that the focus has been on containment after the fact rather than limiting the early exposure.

We have known for a long time that the current scenario of an asymptomatic person from West Africa entering the USA and then developing symptoms was quite likely to happen.  Let us look at our current approach to this scenario happening and what we could do differently.

Hospitals are training their staff to ask about travel history and symptoms and then invoke the appropriate protocols using checklists.  This approach does not address a potential much earlier point of intervention that would decrease exposure and limit the chaos.

The current approach requires a patient who has traveled to the US from West Africa who gets symptoms to actually get to hospital and navigate the intake process to make it to a provider who may still fail to do the right thing as happened in this first case.  Along the way the patient may use a cab or public transport, touch door knobs, counter tops and railings and be in physical contact with several people. While it is not easy to spread Ebola by contact (usually the patient would have to be quite sick) just the fear of possible transmission and the amount of effort it would entail to track down people at real risk vs those with just insignificant contact would be huge and cripple the system.

This person if he develops symptoms, since he came from West Africa, has only one fear dominating his mind, "Do I have Ebola?"  The  approach needs to be to have this person stay in his hotel room or home and call a dedicated hotline that is manned by a trained person who can invoke the appropriate protocol.

How can we make this happen?  The process needs to start at the international airport where a person first lands.

  • There should be signage at the airport informing travelers from West Africa about the hotline if they get symptoms.  They could pick up a sticky note with the phone number and paste it to their passport.
  • Each person from West Africa should be given a simple thermometer at entry to the US.
  • They should be entered into a database 
  • They should be required to check their temperature each day and report it via a phone line/text/website that enters it into this database.
  • The hotline phone number should be imprinted on the thermometer cover
  • If they fail to enter the temperature, it should trigger someone should contact them.
  • If their temperature is >threshold someone should contact them to ensure that they called the hotline.
This seems to be common sense but we are not doing this.  How do we know this?  A recent report by CNN highlights the abject failure of communication at the airport where 3 reporters returning from West Africa got three completely different experiences when they mentioned where they were coming from. The agents were not aware of or could not locate the information regarding how to handle these travelers.

If somehow this step does not work, and the person does end up at a healthcare facility with symptoms without calling the hotline, we need to intervene before they have to navigate the intake process like any other patient.
  • Every entrance needs to have signage regarding steps to follow for a traveler from these countries with symptoms
  • It should have a touchless skin sanitizer next to the signage
  • After using it, the person should be able to use a phone with a speed dial to a trained infection control staff who would direct the patient to appropriate location limiting exposure to others.


Just the one case of the unfortunate Mr. Ducan has highlighted the tremendous effort that it will take to monitor and keep quarantined his approximately 100 contacts.  As more of these cases happen, we will be left with the scenario of a large number of healthcare workers exposed and quarantined.  This will cause a huge burden on our already fragile health care system.

We need to adopt an approach of earlier intervention.  The only risk of such an approach is causing anxiety but it has the potential of preventing exposure of large number of people.  We had many months to prepare for this.  We have a short window when such an approach might still work.  Now that the danger is clear and present, can we do this right?

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Do you need words to communicate? The Future of Medicine and the Brain-Computer Interface in 2064

This article is part of the 'Think Further' series, sponsored by Fred Alger Management, Inc.  For more 'Think Further' content and videos, visit thinkfurtheralger.com.


Dr. Daniel Kraft on Brain Computer Interface


Dr. Daniel Kraft on Medicine 2064

Computers: Inputs, Outputs and Form Factors

Ever since the invention of computers, humans have developed progressively easier and more intuitive methods to communicate with them.  We have come a long way, from the era of inputting instructions via punch cards and command line interfaces to the current generation of multi-touch screen devices that respond to stylus and voice input. Computer outputs have also evolved from dot matrix printers and cathode ray tubes to thin flat panel displays and hand-held screen capable of full multimedia experience.  Computers are also getting progressively smaller and more wearable in the form of smart eye wear and smart watches that are paired with mobile devices carried by the user in the pocket or handbag.

Where will we be in 50 years?

The next big advance in human computer interface is likely to be "Brain-Computer Interface" (BCI) or communicating with computers using thoughts. While this may seem to be stuff for science fiction, sending instructions to computers using thought control is getting closer to reality.  There have been several instances of early use of this technology with the most famous one being the opening ceremony of the recent FIFA World Cup in Brazil (1).  A young man who was paralyzed from the neck down was fitted with an exoskeleton that was controlled by a computer on his back.  Just by thinking about it, he was able to "tell" the computer to move the exoskeleton to allow him to kick a soccer ball.  Even more amazing was an experiment at the University of Washington where a researcher was able to control the finger movement of a colleague by transmitting his thoughts over the Internet (2).  Both researchers were wearing "thinking caps" connected via computers to the Internet.  There were no electrodes implanted in their brains i.e. non-invasive BCI.

These are proofs of concept that this technology can:
1.  Allow us to input instructions to computers using our thoughts.
2.  Allow computers to transmit signals to our brains to move specific body parts.

By 2064 non-invasive BCI technology may have several applications:


Patients with movement disorders:

There are several diseases where the person can think clearly but cannot control his or her body movements.  Patients with strokes are often left with weakness of parts of their body.  This is also seen in cases of patients with spinal cord injuries and certain presentations of conditions like ALS (Lou Gehrig's disease) and Parkinson's disease.  By wearing appropriate types of exoskeletons or bionic parts that are connected to a computer, their brains would be able to drive the exoskeletons to perform appropriate movements.

Patients with loss of limb or parts of a limb:

People can lose body parts from trauma or due to amputations for cancers or infections.  While prosthetic limbs can allow them to perform movements like walking, most current prosthetics do not allow fine motor control.  It is possible that by the year 2064, brain computer interfaces would allow these prosthetics to replicate almost natural movements of the hand and fingers.

So far we have talked mostly about controlling movement or motor control with BCI.  This is done by using thoughts to input instructions into computers.  The converse - having computers output information into the human brain is more difficult.  This is particularly true of non-invasive BCI - i.e. without implanting electrodes in the brain.  Still the University of Washington experiment described above, showed that this is possible.  Using electrodes implanted in mouse brains, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology were able to implant false memories into mice (3).  Attempts have been made to send signals directly from cameras into the brains of blind patients to allow them to see crude images.

By 2064, invasive BCI may have several applications:


Patients with sensory deficits particularly blindness:
Blindness is one of the afflictions that humans fear the most.  Researchers at Cornell University have had success in mapping signals from the retina going to the brains in mice via the optic nerve (4).  They have been successful in producing quite realistic images using this method.  Over the next few decades, it should be possible to use this technology to develop functioning prosthetic eyes.  While this will mean that electrodes are not directly stimulating the visual cortex, it is still an example of BCI as the retina and optic nerves are considered extensions of the brain.

Patients with memory deficits:
Caregivers often struggle to help patients with dementia complete some of the required activities of daily living.  These patients may not have motor problems like those described above but need help with activities like getting dressed.  It may be possible that like the University of Washington researchers, caregivers might be able to get their loved ones perform some simple activities by transmitting their thoughts using "thinking caps".


As outlined in these examples, the brain-computer interface has huge potential and with the amount of ongoing research in this area, we should expect to see some real applications in medicine by the year 2064.

Links to references cited in this post:

  1. GeoBeats News: Paraplegic man in Robotic Suit kicks off World Cuphttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZrvdODe1QI
  2. NeuralSystemsLab: Direct Brain-to-Brain Communication in Humans: A Pilot Study https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNRDc714W5I
  3. Ramirez et al; Creating a False Memory in the Hippocampus http://www.sciencemag.org/content/341/6144/387
  4. Sheila Nirenberg; A Prosthetic Eye to Treat Blindness; TEDMED 2011 http://www.ted.com/talks/sheila_nirenberg_a_prosthetic_eye_to_treat_blindness